Changes

In the context of {{link right|embryonic|stem cell research}}, [[Joseph Bottum]] wrote:  

In the context of {{link right|embryonic|stem cell research}}, [[Joseph Bottum]] wrote:  

<blockquote>

<blockquote>

I have long suspected that science, in the context of the editorial page of the New York Times, was simply a stalking-horse for something else. In fact, for two something-elses: a chance to discredit America's religious believers, and an opportunity to put yet another hedge around the legalization of abortion.<ref> [http://www.opinionjournal.com/federation/feature/?id=110010915] {{dead link}}</ref></blockquote>  

I have long suspected that science, in the context of the editorial page of the New York Times, was simply a stalking-horse for something else. In fact, for two something-elses: a chance to discredit America's religious believers, and an opportunity to put yet another hedge around the legalization of abortion.<ref>[http://www.opinionjournal.com/federation/feature/?id=110010915] {{dead link}}</ref></blockquote>  

==Abortion==

==Abortion==

Other groups ignore various fields of science in the context of [[abortion]]. As a supporter of abortion, the Worldwatch Institute claims:

Other groups ignore various fields of science in the context of [[abortion]]. As a supporter of abortion, the Worldwatch Institute claims:

<blockquote>

<blockquote>

The Institute's interdisciplinary research is based on the best available science and focuses on the challenges that climate change, resource degradation, and population growth pose for meeting human needs in the 21st century.<ref>Worldwatch Institute. ''About Worldwatch''; (2010) [http://www.worldwatch.org/About#about/]</ref></blockquote>

The Institute's interdisciplinary research is based on the best available science and focuses on the challenges that climate change, resource degradation, and population growth pose for meeting human needs in the 21st century.<ref>[http://www.worldwatch.org/About#about/ Worldwatch Institute. ''About Worldwatch''; (2010)]</ref></blockquote>

This is contrasted against the findings of Jerome LeJeune, Professor of Fundamental Genetics at the University of Paris Faculty of Medicine, who stated:

This is contrasted against the findings of Jerome LeJeune, Professor of Fundamental Genetics at the University of Paris Faculty of Medicine, who stated:

To accept the fact that after fertilization has taken place a new human has come into being is no longer a matter of taste or opinion…it is plain experimental evidence.<ref>Lejeune J. cited in Scott R et al. ''Fetal Development''; Health Care Ethics presentation, University of Kentucky;  (n.d.) [http://www.uky.edu/Classes/PHI/305.002/fd.htm]</ref></blockquote>

To accept the fact that after fertilization has taken place a new human has come into being is no longer a matter of taste or opinion…it is plain experimental evidence.<ref>Lejeune J. cited in Scott R et al. ''Fetal Development''; Health Care Ethics presentation, University of Kentucky;  (n.d.) [http://www.uky.edu/Classes/PHI/305.002/fd.htm]</ref></blockquote>

In addition, Joesph Howard, Director of the American Bioethics Advisory Commission said:

In addition, Joseph Howard, Director of the American Bioethics Advisory Commission said:

<blockquote>

<blockquote>

<references />

<references />

==See Also==

==See also==

*[[Evolution syndrome]]

*[[Evolution syndrome]]

* [[Junk science]]

* [[Junk science]]