Difference between revisions of "C.N. v. Ridgewood"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DrSandstone (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''C. N. v. Ridgewood Bd. of Educ.'', 430 F.3d 159 (3rd Cir. 2006), was a case brought by parents against their school district for asking personal questions of their children in a survey without parental permission. The questions concerned drug use, sex, suicide, and many other privacy-invading issues. | + | ''C. N. v. Ridgewood Bd. of Educ.'', 430 F.3d 159 (3rd Cir. 2006), was a case brought by parents against their school district for asking personal questions of their children in a survey without parental permission. The questions concerned [[drug]] use, [[sex]], [[suicide]], and many other privacy-invading issues. |
| − | The Court of Appeals, in a decision joined by future U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, held that parents had no right to be informed about the survey beforehand and no right to require their consent before compelling their children to answer. | + | The [[Court of Appeals]], in a decision joined by future [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[Samuel Alito]], held that parents had no right to be informed about the survey beforehand and no right to require their consent before compelling their children to answer. |
[[Category:United States law]] | [[Category:United States law]] | ||
Revision as of 19:34, April 23, 2007
C. N. v. Ridgewood Bd. of Educ., 430 F.3d 159 (3rd Cir. 2006), was a case brought by parents against their school district for asking personal questions of their children in a survey without parental permission. The questions concerned drug use, sex, suicide, and many other privacy-invading issues.
The Court of Appeals, in a decision joined by future U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, held that parents had no right to be informed about the survey beforehand and no right to require their consent before compelling their children to answer.