Difference between revisions of "Talk:Asexual"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: This is nonsense, it could be loosely an article for hermaphrodite but not asexual. It should be erased unless you want to discuss asexuality which is the only way it makes sense. ~~~~)
(No difference)

Revision as of 22:37, April 23, 2007

This is nonsense, it could be loosely an article for hermaphrodite but not asexual. It should be erased unless you want to discuss asexuality which is the only way it makes sense. Tmtoulouse 18:37, 23 April 2007 (EDT)