Difference between revisions of "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Bold, links)
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
In '''''Bates v. State Bar of Arizona''''', 433 U.S. 350 (1977), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that enforcement of a ban on [[attorney]] advertising would violate the [[First Amendment|First]] and [[Fourteenth Amendment]] rights of attorneys seeking to advertise the fees they charged for certain routine legal services.
 
In '''''Bates v. State Bar of Arizona''''', 433 U.S. 350 (1977), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that enforcement of a ban on [[attorney]] advertising would violate the [[First Amendment|First]] and [[Fourteenth Amendment]] rights of attorneys seeking to advertise the fees they charged for certain routine legal services.
  
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
−
[[category:First Amendment]]
+
[[Category:First Amendment]]
−
[[category:Fourteenth Amendment]]
+
[[Category:Fourteenth Amendment]]

Revision as of 06:56, June 27, 2016

In Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), the U.S. Supreme Court held that enforcement of a ban on attorney advertising would violate the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of attorneys seeking to advertise the fees they charged for certain routine legal services.