| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| | * Use of bizarre jargon such as "[[quote mining]]," "[[moving the goalposts]]" and "[[Fundamentalism|fundies]]"; use of incoherent phrases like "unconvincingly hysterical" | | * Use of bizarre jargon such as "[[quote mining]]," "[[moving the goalposts]]" and "[[Fundamentalism|fundies]]"; use of incoherent phrases like "unconvincingly hysterical" |
| | * Inordinate attempt to demonize the other side, as in overuse of the term [[creationist]] and [[fundamentalist]]. The latter example includes the attempt to show that [[Christian]] fundamentalists are morally equivalent to [[Muslim]] fundamentalists, whether in their extreme rejection of modernity or in their practice and advocacy of [[terrorism]]. | | * Inordinate attempt to demonize the other side, as in overuse of the term [[creationist]] and [[fundamentalist]]. The latter example includes the attempt to show that [[Christian]] fundamentalists are morally equivalent to [[Muslim]] fundamentalists, whether in their extreme rejection of modernity or in their practice and advocacy of [[terrorism]]. |
| − | * An astounding lack of understanding -- or denial -- of how most great scientists and mathematicians either rejected evolution or were silent about it | + | * An astounding lack of understanding—or denial—of how most great scientists and mathematicians either rejected evolution or were silent about it |
| | * An equal lack of understanding, or denial, that most of the greatest scientists in the Western world asserted the reality of [[creation]] and the [[Great Flood]] prior to the [[Enlightenment]], or else a denial that their scientific achievements (including those of [[Sir Isaac Newton]]!) matter today. | | * An equal lack of understanding, or denial, that most of the greatest scientists in the Western world asserted the reality of [[creation]] and the [[Great Flood]] prior to the [[Enlightenment]], or else a denial that their scientific achievements (including those of [[Sir Isaac Newton]]!) matter today. |
| | * Frequent reliance on [[circular reasoning]], as in defining evolution as change and [[survival of the fittest]] as those who survive | | * Frequent reliance on [[circular reasoning]], as in defining evolution as change and [[survival of the fittest]] as those who survive |
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| | * Ignoring the clear historical link between [[Darwinism]], [[Eugenics]], and the [[Holocaust]]. | | * Ignoring the clear historical link between [[Darwinism]], [[Eugenics]], and the [[Holocaust]]. |
| | * [[Deliberate ignorance]] about [[Counterexamples to evolution|phenomena that evolution cannot explain]], such as remarkable [[migration]] and [[homing]], or the existence of the [[whale]]. | | * [[Deliberate ignorance]] about [[Counterexamples to evolution|phenomena that evolution cannot explain]], such as remarkable [[migration]] and [[homing]], or the existence of the [[whale]]. |
| − | * Claim that the theory of evolution can be used as an applied science, like the development of flu vaccines, but continuing to support the theory when the application fails. <ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/opinion/20sun3.html?ref=opinion</ref> | + | * Claim that the theory of evolution can be used as an applied science, like the development of flu vaccines, but continuing to support the theory when the application fails.<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/opinion/20sun3.html?ref=opinion</ref> |
| | | | |
| | {{evolution}} | | {{evolution}} |