Difference between revisions of "Long v. Simmons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FernoKlump (talk | contribs) m |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Spelling/Grammar Check & Cleanup) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In '''''Long v. Simmons''''', 77 F.3d 878, 880 (5th Cir. 1996), the [[U.S. Court of Appeals]] for the [[Fifth Circuit]] held that "[a] dismissal without prejudice is appropriate only if the failure to comply with the court order was the result of purposeful delay or contumaciousness and the record reflects that the district court employed lesser sanctions before dismissing the action." | In '''''Long v. Simmons''''', 77 F.3d 878, 880 (5th Cir. 1996), the [[U.S. Court of Appeals]] for the [[Fifth Circuit]] held that "[a] dismissal without prejudice is appropriate only if the failure to comply with the court order was the result of purposeful delay or contumaciousness and the record reflects that the district court employed lesser sanctions before dismissing the action." | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Circuit Cases]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Fifth Circuit]] |
Latest revision as of 17:35, June 28, 2016
In Long v. Simmons, 77 F.3d 878, 880 (5th Cir. 1996), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that "[a] dismissal without prejudice is appropriate only if the failure to comply with the court order was the result of purposeful delay or contumaciousness and the record reflects that the district court employed lesser sanctions before dismissing the action."