Difference between revisions of "Neutralism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(various grammatical changes)
(→‎top: Spelling, Grammar, and General Cleanup)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Neutralism was remaining neutral when faith or morality require taking a position or stand.  It was  the ducking of moral or religious responsibility.
+
'''Neutralism''' is the position of remaining neutral when [[faith]] or [[morality]] requires that one take a stand.  Neutralism ducks moral or religious [[responsibility]]. Thus, neutralism implicitly takes a stand in itself.
  
−
The philosopher [[Benedict de Spinoza]] advocated this approach in the 1600s as a result of his view that mind, matter, time and everything that seems to be real was merely a manifestation of only one substance, One Reality.
+
Philosopher [[Benedict de Spinoza]] advocated this approach in the 1600s as a result of his view that [[mind]], [[matter]], [[time]] and everything that seems to be real are mere manifestations of one [[substance]], one reality.
−
[[category:philosophy]]
+
[[Category:Philosophy]]
−
[[category:movie]]
+
[[Category:Religion]]

Latest revision as of 12:35, July 11, 2016

Neutralism is the position of remaining neutral when faith or morality requires that one take a stand. Neutralism ducks moral or religious responsibility. Thus, neutralism implicitly takes a stand in itself.

Philosopher Benedict de Spinoza advocated this approach in the 1600s as a result of his view that mind, matter, time and everything that seems to be real are mere manifestations of one substance, one reality.