Difference between revisions of "Committee to Recall Robert Menendez v. Wells"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RichDunbar (talk | contribs) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Spelling, Grammar, and General Cleanup) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In ''Committee to Recall Robert Menendez v. Wells'', 2010 N.J. Super. LEXIS 40 (Mar. 16, 2010), the Superior Court of [[New Jersey]], Appellate Division, unanimously held that the Secretary of State of New Jersey must accept and file the recall petition and allow the process to move forward with respect to the recall of a U.S. Senator, Robert Menendez. Menendez was not recalled. | In ''Committee to Recall Robert Menendez v. Wells'', 2010 N.J. Super. LEXIS 40 (Mar. 16, 2010), the Superior Court of [[New Jersey]], Appellate Division, unanimously held that the Secretary of State of New Jersey must accept and file the recall petition and allow the process to move forward with respect to the recall of a U.S. Senator, Robert Menendez. Menendez was not recalled. | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Recall]] |
Latest revision as of 13:37, July 11, 2016
In Committee to Recall Robert Menendez v. Wells, 2010 N.J. Super. LEXIS 40 (Mar. 16, 2010), the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, unanimously held that the Secretary of State of New Jersey must accept and file the recall petition and allow the process to move forward with respect to the recall of a U.S. Senator, Robert Menendez. Menendez was not recalled.