240
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 91:
Line 91: + + + + + + + + +
→Uncle Ed's two cents
::If this were true, somebody would have pointed out an example by now. I've been here 5 weeks, and ideological bans simply do not happen. Do not spread false rumors, or I will suspend your account. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:45, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
::If this were true, somebody would have pointed out an example by now. I've been here 5 weeks, and ideological bans simply do not happen. Do not spread false rumors, or I will suspend your account. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:45, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Ah, you mean like the following interchange on A.Schafly's talk page just before I was banned...
<nowiki> == Response to accusations of ideology ==
+
+ This is quite an interesting accusation. I thought that I was simply pointing out that the entry as written was deficient, in that it contained no references and seemed to present an unjustified diatribe against what the author perceived to be 'liberals'. Not knowing any liberals, myself, I would like to know where i can find such information, so as to read about them, and convince myself that the statements are true. As to defacing, I did not change ONE ITEM of text that you wrote, hence I do not consider that defacement. --[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 18:05, 20 April 2007 (EDT) </nowiki>
--[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 07:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------