Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
clean up & uniformity
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{HS_American_History}}{{DEFAULTSORT:American History Homework Model Answers 05}}
 
{{HS_American_History}}{{DEFAULTSORT:American History Homework Model Answers 05}}
−
[[American History Lecture Five|Lecture]] - [[American_History_Homework_Five|Questions]] - [[American History Homework Five Answers|Student Answers]]
+
[[American History Lecture Five|Lecture]] - [[American History Homework Five|Questions]] - [[American History Homework Five Answers|Student Answers]]
    
1.  Imagine that someone by the name of Joe Biden lived in 1858.  Imagine also that he belonged to the "Know Nothing Party."  The following would be true about Mr. Biden EXCEPT:
 
1.  Imagine that someone by the name of Joe Biden lived in 1858.  Imagine also that he belonged to the "Know Nothing Party."  The following would be true about Mr. Biden EXCEPT:
Line 74: Line 74:     
These questions require answers that are a bit longer than the answers above.  Answer three out of the following questions (in addition to the questions above):
 
These questions require answers that are a bit longer than the answers above.  Answer three out of the following questions (in addition to the questions above):
−
<br><br>
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 
H1. Discuss any of the debate issues or mysteries relating to 1840-1860.
 
H1. Discuss any of the debate issues or mysteries relating to 1840-1860.
   Line 99: Line 101:  
H5. Explain how the ''Dred Scott'' decision was similar to judicial activism today, such as ''Roe v. Wade''.
 
H5. Explain how the ''Dred Scott'' decision was similar to judicial activism today, such as ''Roe v. Wade''.
   −
:In the ''Dred Scott vs. Sanford'' case, the job of the judges was merely to decide whether or not Dred Scott was free or not. Instead, they handed down an aggressive decision which was not within their rights at all. According to their decision, slaves could not even sue in court and were mere property. All they were supposed to do was decide if he was free or not. (Duncan B.)
+
:In the ''Dred Scott v. Sanford'' case, the job of the judges was merely to decide whether or not Dred Scott was free or not. Instead, they handed down an aggressive decision which was not within their rights at all. According to their decision, slaves could not even sue in court and were mere property. All they were supposed to do was decide if he was free or not. (Duncan B.)
   −
:In both the Dred Scott Decision and Roe V. Wade, the Supreme Court essentially took the place of God and stated that some people- unborn babies or slaves- were somehow less than human and therefore had no rights.  (Jess S.)
+
:In both the ''Dred Scott'' decision and ''Roe v. Wade'', the Supreme Court essentially took the place of God and stated that some people - unborn babies or slaves - were somehow less than human and therefore had no rights.  (Jess S.)
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
57,977

edits

Navigation menu