Difference between revisions of "Intelligent design of life"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎top: clean up & uniformity)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
A scientist can make arguments for the intelligent design of life or the universe without making God a premise in the argument - that is, a scientist can argue for [[intelligent design]] based upon scientific evidence (as some of our scientists are doing) without basing that argument on a prior belief in [[God]]. [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349]
 
A scientist can make arguments for the intelligent design of life or the universe without making God a premise in the argument - that is, a scientist can argue for [[intelligent design]] based upon scientific evidence (as some of our scientists are doing) without basing that argument on a prior belief in [[God]]. [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?id=349]
  
−
[[category:quotes]]
+
[[Category:Quotes]]

Latest revision as of 05:24, July 12, 2016

A scientist can make arguments for the intelligent design of life or the universe without making God a premise in the argument - that is, a scientist can argue for intelligent design based upon scientific evidence (as some of our scientists are doing) without basing that argument on a prior belief in God. [1]