Difference between revisions of "Baker v. McCollan"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(→‎External links: clean up & uniformity)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Justice [[William Rehnquist]] wrote the opinion for the 6-3 Court, with the [[liberal]] Justices dissenting.
 
Justice [[William Rehnquist]] wrote the opinion for the 6-3 Court, with the [[liberal]] Justices dissenting.
  
−
==External Links==
+
==External links==
 
*[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=443&invol=137 Case] at FindLaw (registration may be required)
 
*[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=443&invol=137 Case] at FindLaw (registration may be required)
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
−
[[category:Section 1983]]
+
[[Category:Section 1983]]

Latest revision as of 02:36, July 13, 2016

In Baker v. McCollan, 443 U.S. 137, 142 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court held in dictum that a violation of state law cannot establish a basis for a Section 1983 claim.

Justice William Rehnquist wrote the opinion for the 6-3 Court, with the liberal Justices dissenting.

External links

  • Case at FindLaw (registration may be required)