| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| | At current prices, fracking provides a fuel for generating [[electricity]] that is cleaner and cheaper than [[coal]]. This lowers the amount of air pollution from making electricity. However, some people argue that fracking also poses environmental risks. First, some drillers do not properly dispose of the fracking fluid mixture after the well is done. Second, people are now drilling wells in places that did not historically have oil and gas wells. One of the first successful places which used fracking was the Barnett Shale near Ft Worth, Texas. Wells were drilled from locations along the Trinity River near the downtown part of that city. Third, some wells do not properly cement the gap between the well casing and the surrounding rock. Historically, shale rock separated the rock layer that supplied water wells with drinking water from other porous layers that held oil and gas. Without cement, and with more cracks in the shale layer, it is possible that some gas can travel into the rock layer holding the water and contaminate it. Fear of drinking water contamination or destruction of natural land led some voters to argue that fracking should be banned. The Obama Administration proposed regulation of fracking on federally-owned lands.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/05/us/new-fracking-rule-is-issued-by-obama-administration.html?_r=0|title=New Proposal on Fracking Gives Ground to Industry|work=New York Times|date=May 4, 2012 |accessdate=March 18, 2014|first=John|last=Broder}}</ref> Producers argue that if the drilling contractors do their jobs properly, these forms of environmental damage can be avoided. | | At current prices, fracking provides a fuel for generating [[electricity]] that is cleaner and cheaper than [[coal]]. This lowers the amount of air pollution from making electricity. However, some people argue that fracking also poses environmental risks. First, some drillers do not properly dispose of the fracking fluid mixture after the well is done. Second, people are now drilling wells in places that did not historically have oil and gas wells. One of the first successful places which used fracking was the Barnett Shale near Ft Worth, Texas. Wells were drilled from locations along the Trinity River near the downtown part of that city. Third, some wells do not properly cement the gap between the well casing and the surrounding rock. Historically, shale rock separated the rock layer that supplied water wells with drinking water from other porous layers that held oil and gas. Without cement, and with more cracks in the shale layer, it is possible that some gas can travel into the rock layer holding the water and contaminate it. Fear of drinking water contamination or destruction of natural land led some voters to argue that fracking should be banned. The Obama Administration proposed regulation of fracking on federally-owned lands.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/05/us/new-fracking-rule-is-issued-by-obama-administration.html?_r=0|title=New Proposal on Fracking Gives Ground to Industry|work=New York Times|date=May 4, 2012 |accessdate=March 18, 2014|first=John|last=Broder}}</ref> Producers argue that if the drilling contractors do their jobs properly, these forms of environmental damage can be avoided. |
| | ==Fracking bans== | | ==Fracking bans== |
| − | Although fracking has been used to complete wells since 1947, it did not draw public attention and criticism until recent years. In 2010, the Josh Fox movie "Gasland" caused the general public to question the safety surrounding fracking and created a bit of panic among environmental activists. It shows a water tap that could be ignited by entrapped methane.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ApZkNsXfJE</ref> This prompted the natural gas industry to release a rebuttal film called "Truthland".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.truthlandmovie.com/watch-movie/|title=Truthland View The Movie|accessdate=May 5,2016}}</ref> The debate has lead environmental activists to call for bans or moratoria on fracking specifically or oil and gas well drilling more generally. | + | Although fracking has been used to complete wells since 1947, it did not draw public attention and criticism until recent years. In 2010, the Josh Fox movie "Gasland" caused the general public to question the safety surrounding fracking and created a bit of panic among environmental activists. It shows a water tap that could be ignited by entrapped methane.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ApZkNsXfJE</ref> This prompted the natural gas industry to release a rebuttal film called "Truthland".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.truthlandmovie.com/watch-movie/|title=Truthland View The Movie|accessdate=May 5, 2016}}</ref> The debate has lead environmental activists to call for bans or moratoria on fracking specifically or oil and gas well drilling more generally. |
| | | | |
| | On March 18, 2014, a referendum on fracking in southern [[Illinois]] won in a landslide. Fracking has brought prosperity to [[Pennsylvania]], where it is allowed, and is controversial in [[New York]] and [[New Jersey]], where it is banned by statewide moratoria and some local ordinances.<ref>[http://www.hudsonreporter.com/view/full_story/19312259/article-Secaucus-bans-%E2%80%98fracking%E2%80%99-Local-officials-also-call-for-statewide-and-national-ban-?instance=special_coverage_bullets_right_column NJ city bans fracking]</ref> | | On March 18, 2014, a referendum on fracking in southern [[Illinois]] won in a landslide. Fracking has brought prosperity to [[Pennsylvania]], where it is allowed, and is controversial in [[New York]] and [[New Jersey]], where it is banned by statewide moratoria and some local ordinances.<ref>[http://www.hudsonreporter.com/view/full_story/19312259/article-Secaucus-bans-%E2%80%98fracking%E2%80%99-Local-officials-also-call-for-statewide-and-national-ban-?instance=special_coverage_bullets_right_column NJ city bans fracking]</ref> |
| Line 23: |
Line 23: |
| | | | |
| | == Liberal science == | | == Liberal science == |
| − | The same people that say man is causing [[Global Warming]] are now claiming that hydraulic fracturing is causing [[earthquake]]s and pollutes water supplies. Liberals are anti-oil and will do anything to stop America from creating more oil chiefly because of the atmospheric pollution it is associated with. Those organizations with an agenda and money will continue to spread lies in order to achieve a ban, despite the lack of evidence. <ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-27/fracking-s-earthquake-risks-push-states-to-collaborate.html Fracking’s Earthquake Risks Push States to Collaborate, Bloomberg.com, march 27, 2014]</ref> In 2015, the [[EPA]] ruled that fracking was not a hazard to water supplies. <ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/article/419418/even-obamas-epa-now-admits-fracking-hasnt-harmed-water-supplies-jillian-kay-melchior Even Obama’s EPA Now Admits Fracking Hasn’t Harmed Water Supplies, National Review, June 15, 2015 </ref> This didn't stop the Governor Andrew Cuomo of [[New York]] from banning fracking in his state. | + | The same people that say man is causing [[Global Warming]] are now claiming that hydraulic fracturing is causing [[earthquake]]s and pollutes water supplies. Liberals are anti-oil and will do anything to stop America from creating more oil chiefly because of the atmospheric pollution it is associated with. Those organizations with an agenda and money will continue to spread lies in order to achieve a ban, despite the lack of evidence.<ref>[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-27/fracking-s-earthquake-risks-push-states-to-collaborate.html Fracking’s Earthquake Risks Push States to Collaborate, Bloomberg.com, march 27, 2014]</ref> In 2015, the [[EPA]] ruled that fracking was not a hazard to water supplies.<ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/article/419418/even-obamas-epa-now-admits-fracking-hasnt-harmed-water-supplies-jillian-kay-melchior Even Obama’s EPA Now Admits Fracking Hasn’t Harmed Water Supplies, National Review, June 15, 2015</ref> This didn't stop the Governor Andrew Cuomo of [[New York]] from banning fracking in his state. |
| | | | |
| | The study frequently cited by advocates of fracking bans was authored by Cornell University scientists Robert Howarth and Anthony Ingraffea which set high estimates on the amount of methane released during the drilling and development of gas wells that are fracked. However, this study has been widely criticized by subsequent research.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2013/09/18/university-of-texas-environmental-defense-fund-shale-gas-study-unmasks-politics-of-anti-fracking-activist-cornell-scientists/#1a7417a37880|title=University Of Texas-Environmental Defense Fund Shale Gas Study Unmasks Politics Of Anti-Fracking Activist Cornell Scientists|work=Forbes|date=September 18, 2013|first=Jon |last=Entine|accessdate=May 4, 2016}}</ref> | | The study frequently cited by advocates of fracking bans was authored by Cornell University scientists Robert Howarth and Anthony Ingraffea which set high estimates on the amount of methane released during the drilling and development of gas wells that are fracked. However, this study has been widely criticized by subsequent research.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/jonentine/2013/09/18/university-of-texas-environmental-defense-fund-shale-gas-study-unmasks-politics-of-anti-fracking-activist-cornell-scientists/#1a7417a37880|title=University Of Texas-Environmental Defense Fund Shale Gas Study Unmasks Politics Of Anti-Fracking Activist Cornell Scientists|work=Forbes|date=September 18, 2013|first=Jon |last=Entine|accessdate=May 4, 2016}}</ref> |
| Line 42: |
Line 42: |
| | <references/> | | <references/> |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category:energy]] | + | [[Category:Energy]] |