Difference between revisions of "Genetic fallacy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added "See Also" section)
(clean up & uniformity)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The '''genetic fallacy''' is a [[logical fallacy]] wherein an argument is based on the circumstances of something's origin or history when that origin or history has nothing to do with the present value of that something.<ref>[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/genefall.html Fallacy Files: Genetic Fallacy]</ref>  The fallacy is thus a fallacy of relevance.  An example is arguing that [[Christian]]s should not decorate [[Christmas tree]]s because thousands of years ago such practices were performed by [[pagans]].
 
The '''genetic fallacy''' is a [[logical fallacy]] wherein an argument is based on the circumstances of something's origin or history when that origin or history has nothing to do with the present value of that something.<ref>[http://www.fallacyfiles.org/genefall.html Fallacy Files: Genetic Fallacy]</ref>  The fallacy is thus a fallacy of relevance.  An example is arguing that [[Christian]]s should not decorate [[Christmas tree]]s because thousands of years ago such practices were performed by [[pagans]].
−
==See Also==
+
==See also==
 
*[[Guilt by Association]]
 
*[[Guilt by Association]]
 
*[[Reductio ad Hitlerum]]
 
*[[Reductio ad Hitlerum]]
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
−
[[Category: Logical Fallacies]]
+
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]

Revision as of 13:21, July 13, 2016

The genetic fallacy is a logical fallacy wherein an argument is based on the circumstances of something's origin or history when that origin or history has nothing to do with the present value of that something.[1] The fallacy is thus a fallacy of relevance. An example is arguing that Christians should not decorate Christmas trees because thousands of years ago such practices were performed by pagans.

See also

References