Difference between revisions of "Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Hawk630 (Talk) to last revision by FernoKlump) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The decision was rendered by Judge [[D. Michael Fisher]]. Then-Judge [[Samuel Alito]] joined his decision, as did Judge [[Thomas L. Ambro]]. | The decision was rendered by Judge [[D. Michael Fisher]]. Then-Judge [[Samuel Alito]] joined his decision, as did Judge [[Thomas L. Ambro]]. | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Circuit Cases]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Third Circuit]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Peer review]] |
Revision as of 13:33, July 13, 2016
In Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital, 423 F.3d 184, 201 (3d Cir. 2005), the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a trial court's ruling that the defendant hospital had immunity from damages for suspending and then revoking a physician's medical-dental staff privileges, because this adverse peer review met the definition of professional review under HCQIA.
The decision was rendered by Judge D. Michael Fisher. Then-Judge Samuel Alito joined his decision, as did Judge Thomas L. Ambro.