Difference between revisions of "Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DanielPulido (talk | contribs) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In '''''Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange''''', 422 U.S. 659, 682 (1975), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that implied immunity from the [[antitrust]] laws will be found only in the face of a "plain repugnancy between the antitrust and regulatory provisions" (quoting ''United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank'', 374 U.S. 321, 350-51 (1963)). <ref>http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=422&invol=659</ref> | + | In '''''Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange''''', 422 U.S. 659, 682 (1975), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that implied immunity from the [[antitrust]] laws will be found only in the face of a "plain repugnancy between the antitrust and regulatory provisions" (quoting ''United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank'', 374 U.S. 321, 350-51 (1963)).<ref>http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=422&invol=659</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 13:33, July 13, 2016
In Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange, 422 U.S. 659, 682 (1975), the U.S. Supreme Court held that implied immunity from the antitrust laws will be found only in the face of a "plain repugnancy between the antitrust and regulatory provisions" (quoting United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 350-51 (1963)).[1]