Difference between revisions of "Vertical price-fixing"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (wikify)
(→‎References: clean up & uniformity)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
A decade earlier the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] legalized, if justification is shown, the practice of vertical price-fixing to establish a ''maximum'' resale price by retailers.<ref>''State Oil Co. v. Khan'', 522 U.S. 3, 118 S. Ct. 275 (1997), ''overruling'' ''Albrecht v. Herald Co.'', 390 U.S. 145 (1968).</ref>
 
A decade earlier the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] legalized, if justification is shown, the practice of vertical price-fixing to establish a ''maximum'' resale price by retailers.<ref>''State Oil Co. v. Khan'', 522 U.S. 3, 118 S. Ct. 275 (1997), ''overruling'' ''Albrecht v. Herald Co.'', 390 U.S. 145 (1968).</ref>
  
−
== Reference ==
+
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
−
[[category:economics]]
+
[[Category:Economics]]
−
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
+
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

Latest revision as of 21:22, July 13, 2016

Vertical price-fixing consists of a manufacturer or wholesaler setting a minimum price for its goods to be sold by a retailer. This is also known as "resale price maintenance" (RPM).

This practice was automatically ("per se") illegal until June 28, 2007, when the U.S. Supreme Court said that a manufacturer or wholesaler may be able to justice its imposition of a minimum resale price.[1]

A decade earlier the U.S. Supreme Court legalized, if justification is shown, the practice of vertical price-fixing to establish a maximum resale price by retailers.[2]

References

  1. ↑ Leegin Creative Leather Prods. v. PSKS, Inc., 2007 U.S. LEXIS 8668 (2007).
  2. ↑ State Oil Co. v. Khan, 522 U.S. 3, 118 S. Ct. 275 (1997), overruling Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145 (1968).