Difference between revisions of "Caucasian"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(clean up & uniformity)
(→‎top: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: a 19th century → a 19th-century)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:People of Spain.jpg|right|320px]]
 
[[File:People of Spain.jpg|right|320px]]
−
'''White people''' also called '''Caucasian''' is a 19th century term for the white race or people of white [[Europe]]an origin. The definitions of the term "white" have changed over the years.
+
'''White people''' also called '''Caucasian''' is a 19th-century term for the white race or people of white [[Europe]]an origin. The definitions of the term "white" have changed over the years.
  
 
Whites have less [[melanin]] pigment in their skin than other human beings. Darker-skinned people regard them as "white" in contrast to themselves, (see [[skin color]]). The term grew out of belief at the time that European languages originated in the Caucasus (mountains between the Black and Caspian Seas), but this turned out not to be true, so the word "Caucasian" (like "American Indian")  is in fact a misnomer.
 
Whites have less [[melanin]] pigment in their skin than other human beings. Darker-skinned people regard them as "white" in contrast to themselves, (see [[skin color]]). The term grew out of belief at the time that European languages originated in the Caucasus (mountains between the Black and Caspian Seas), but this turned out not to be true, so the word "Caucasian" (like "American Indian")  is in fact a misnomer.

Revision as of 17:14, July 14, 2016

People of Spain.jpg

White people also called Caucasian is a 19th-century term for the white race or people of white European origin. The definitions of the term "white" have changed over the years.

Whites have less melanin pigment in their skin than other human beings. Darker-skinned people regard them as "white" in contrast to themselves, (see skin color). The term grew out of belief at the time that European languages originated in the Caucasus (mountains between the Black and Caspian Seas), but this turned out not to be true, so the word "Caucasian" (like "American Indian") is in fact a misnomer.

Whiteness in many countries is associated with social status. This association is negative in the U.S. and much of Europe (because darker skin among Caucasians indicates they have leisure time to be outside and get tanned[1]). In Latin American,[2] South and East Asian[3] countries, light skin is considered more attractive and is associated with greater wealth. The association between whiteness and social status is mixed in modern and indigenous African cultures.[2][4][5] Before the Industrial Revolution, light-skinned Caucasians were perceived as having higher social status because most workers worked outside.[1]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Kruszelnicki, Karl. "News in Science: Skin Colour 1." March 1, 2001. ABC Science. [1]
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Johnson, L.A. "Documentary, studies renew debate about skin color's impact." December 26, 2006. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06360/748295-51.stm
  3. ↑ Bray, Marianne. "Skin Deep: Dying to be white." May 15, 2002. CNN World. http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/13/asia.whitening/
  4. ↑ Masakhwe, Phitalis Were. "Africa:Dispelling Myths About Albinism." September 10, 2009. http://allafrica.com/stories/200909101054.html
  5. ↑ Baxter, Joan. "The heavy cost of light skin." April 18, 2000. BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/718359.stm