Difference between revisions of "Diagonalization"
m |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: Therefore → Therefore, (3)) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor| | + | {{Math-h}} |
| + | |||
| + | '''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into [[bijection|one-to-one correspondence]] with the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not [[countable]]. This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence. For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets. | ||
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers== | ==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers== | ||
| − | + | First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line <math>\mathbb{R}\,</math> and the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. This function: | |
| + | :<math>y = \frac{\tan^{-1}(x)}{\pi} + \frac{1}{2}</math> | ||
| + | maps the entire real line to the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. Its inverse: | ||
| + | :<math>x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,</math> | ||
| + | maps the open interval to the entire real line. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence. | ||
| − | We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that the | + | We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are [[uncountable]]. |
| − | Assume the numbers in | + | Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers. Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this: |
<math> | <math> | ||
| Line 37: | Line 45: | ||
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>. | <math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>. | ||
| − | + | Therefore, <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore, <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>A. N. Kolmogorov, ''Introductory Real Analysis''. ISBN 978-0486612263.</ref> | |
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God== | ==Diagonalization and the Existence of God== | ||
| − | Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[ | + | Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref> |
| − | However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref> | + | However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref> |
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 49: | Line 57: | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
| − | [[Category:Mathematics]][[Category:Philosophy]] | + | [[Category:Mathematics]] |
| + | [[Category:Philosophy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:48, July 15, 2016
| <math>\frac{d}{dx} \sin x=?\,</math> | This article/section deals with mathematical concepts appropriate for late high school or early college. |
Diagonalization is a technique first used by Georg Cantor, a German mathematician. He used it to show that the real numbers can not be put into one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence. For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.
Proof of the non-countability of real numbers
First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line <math>\mathbb{R}\,</math> and the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. This function:
- <math>y = \frac{\tan^{-1}(x)}{\pi} + \frac{1}{2}</math>
maps the entire real line to the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. Its inverse:
- <math>x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,</math>
maps the open interval to the entire real line.
This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.
We will now use proof by contradiction to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are uncountable.
Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers. Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:
<math> 0.a_{11}a_{12}a_{13}a_{14}a_{15}\dots </math>
<math> 0.a_{21}a_{22}a_{23}a_{24}a_{25}\dots </math>
<math> 0.a_{31}a_{32}a_{33}a_{34}a_{35}\dots </math>
<math> 0.a_{41}a_{42}a_{43}a_{44}a_{45}\dots </math>
<math> \vdots </math>
Where <math>a_{ij}\in\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9\}</math>
Construct the number,
<math>a=0.a_{1}a_{2}a_{3}a_{4}\dots</math>, where
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
Therefore, <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore, <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.[1]
Diagonalization and the Existence of God
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to Saint Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.[2]
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.[3]
References
- ↑ A. N. Kolmogorov, Introductory Real Analysis. ISBN 978-0486612263.
- ↑ http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130
- ↑ Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds, Arkady Plotnitsky. In After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.