Difference between revisions of "Diagonalization"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: Therefore → Therefore, (3))
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|George Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[Mathematician|mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[Real_number|real numbers]] can not be put into 1-1 correspondence to the [[Natural_number|natural numbers]], thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can be applied to any infinite set to construct an even larger infinite set.
+
{{Math-h}}
 +
 
 +
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into [[bijection|one-to-one correspondence]] with the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not [[countable]]. This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence.  For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.
  
 
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
 
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
There exists a map <math>f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow[0,1]</math> (in fact all infinitly supported probability distribution does this). Therefor there are as many number in <math>[0,1]</math> as <math>\mathbb{R}</math>.
+
First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line <math>\mathbb{R}\,</math> and the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>.  This function:
 +
:<math>y = \frac{\tan^{-1}(x)}{\pi} + \frac{1}{2}</math>
 +
maps the entire real line to the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>.  Its inverse:
 +
:<math>x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,</math>
 +
maps the open interval to the entire real line.
 +
 
 +
This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.
  
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are uncountable.
+
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are [[uncountable]].
  
Assume the numbers in [0,1], are countable. Then we can list them as such,
+
Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers. Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:
  
 
<math>
 
<math>
Line 37: Line 45:
 
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
 
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
  
Therefore <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradition and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>Komolgorov, ''Introduction to Real Analysis''. (You can find it in almost any book store).</ref>
+
Therefore, <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore, <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>A. N. Kolmogorov, ''Introductory Real Analysis''. ISBN 978-0486612263.</ref>
  
 
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God==
 
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God==
  
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
+
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
  
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref> This seeming [[Disprove|disproof]] of the existence of God has cast doubt on the validity of Cantor's diagonalization.
+
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
Line 49: Line 57:
 
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
  
[[Category:Mathematics]][[Category:Philosophy]]
+
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 +
[[Category:Philosophy]]

Latest revision as of 15:48, July 15, 2016

<math>\frac{d}{dx} \sin x=?\,</math> This article/section deals with mathematical concepts appropriate for late high school or early college.

Diagonalization is a technique first used by Georg Cantor, a German mathematician. He used it to show that the real numbers can not be put into one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence. For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.

Proof of the non-countability of real numbers

First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line <math>\mathbb{R}\,</math> and the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. This function:

<math>y = \frac{\tan^{-1}(x)}{\pi} + \frac{1}{2}</math>

maps the entire real line to the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. Its inverse:

<math>x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,</math>

maps the open interval to the entire real line.

This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.

We will now use proof by contradiction to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are uncountable.

Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers. Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:

<math> 0.a_{11}a_{12}a_{13}a_{14}a_{15}\dots </math>

<math> 0.a_{21}a_{22}a_{23}a_{24}a_{25}\dots </math>

<math> 0.a_{31}a_{32}a_{33}a_{34}a_{35}\dots </math>

<math> 0.a_{41}a_{42}a_{43}a_{44}a_{45}\dots </math>

<math> \vdots </math>

Where <math>a_{ij}\in\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9\}</math>

Construct the number,

<math>a=0.a_{1}a_{2}a_{3}a_{4}\dots</math>, where


<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.

Therefore, <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore, <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.[1]

Diagonalization and the Existence of God

Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to Saint Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.[2]

However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.[3]

References

  1. A. N. Kolmogorov, Introductory Real Analysis. ISBN 978-0486612263.
  2. http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130
  3. Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds, Arkady Plotnitsky. In After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.