Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
68 bytes added ,  15:48, July 15, 2016
Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: Therefore → Therefore, (3)
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{Math-h}}
 
{{Math-h}}
   −
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]].  He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into [[bijection|1-1 correspondence]] with the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not [[countable]].  This method can also be applied in other contexts.
+
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]].  He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into [[bijection|one-to-one correspondence]] with the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not [[countable]].  This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence.  For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.
    
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
 
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
Line 12: Line 12:  
This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.
 
This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.
   −
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that the open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are [[uncountable]].
+
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are [[uncountable]].
   −
Assume the numbers in the open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers.  Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:
+
Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers.  Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:
    
<math>
 
<math>
Line 45: Line 45:  
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
 
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
   −
Therefore <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>A. N. Kolmogorov, ''Introductory Real Analysis''. ISBN 978-0486612263.</ref>
+
Therefore, <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore, <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>A. N. Kolmogorov, ''Introductory Real Analysis''. ISBN 978-0486612263.</ref>
    
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God==
 
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God==
   −
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
+
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
   −
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref> This seeming [[disproof]] of the existence of God has cast doubt on the validity of Cantor's diagonalization.
+
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref>
    
==References==
 
==References==
Line 57: Line 57:  
{{reflist|2}}
 
{{reflist|2}}
   −
[[Category:Mathematics]][[Category:Philosophy]]
+
[[Category:Mathematics]]
 +
[[Category:Philosophy]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719

edits

Navigation menu