Difference between revisions of "Diagonalization"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Remove apparent parody dating to very first version. There is no "disproof of the existence of God" here.)
(Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: Therefore → Therefore, (3))
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Math-h}}
 
{{Math-h}}
  
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]].  He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into [[bijection|1-1 correspondence]] with the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not [[countable]].  This method can also be applied in other contexts.
+
'''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]].  He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into [[bijection|one-to-one correspondence]] with the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not [[countable]].  This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence.  For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.
  
 
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
 
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers==
Line 12: Line 12:
 
This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.
 
This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.
  
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that the open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are [[uncountable]].
+
We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are [[uncountable]].
  
Assume the numbers in the open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers.  Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:
+
Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers.  Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:
  
 
<math>
 
<math>
Line 45: Line 45:
 
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
 
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.
  
Therefore <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>A. N. Kolmogorov, ''Introductory Real Analysis''. ISBN 978-0486612263.</ref>
+
Therefore, <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore, <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>A. N. Kolmogorov, ''Introductory Real Analysis''. ISBN 978-0486612263.</ref>
  
 
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God==
 
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God==
  
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
+
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to [[Saint Anselm]]'s [[ontological argument]] for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.<ref>http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130</ref>
  
 
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref>
 
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.<ref>''Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds'', Arkady Plotnitsky. In ''After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory'' Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.</ref>

Latest revision as of 15:48, July 15, 2016

<math>\frac{d}{dx} \sin x=?\,</math> This article/section deals with mathematical concepts appropriate for late high school or early college.

Diagonalization is a technique first used by Georg Cantor, a German mathematician. He used it to show that the real numbers can not be put into one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can also be applied in other contexts, to show that two sets can't have a correspondence. For example, it can be used to show that no set can be in 1-1 correspondence with the set of all of its subsets.

Proof of the non-countability of real numbers

First, we create a 1-1 correspondence between the entire real line <math>\mathbb{R}\,</math> and the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. This function:

<math>y = \frac{\tan^{-1}(x)}{\pi} + \frac{1}{2}</math>

maps the entire real line to the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math>. Its inverse:

<math>x = \tan(\pi(y - 1/2))\,</math>

maps the open interval to the entire real line.

This means that the real numbers are in 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers if and only if the open interval <math>(0, 1)\,</math> is in correspondence.

We will now use proof by contradiction to show that this open interval has no such correspondence, and thus it, and the real line as a whole, are uncountable.

Assume the numbers in this open interval are in a 1-1 correspondence with the natural numbers. Then we can make an (infinite) sequential list of them, like this:

<math> 0.a_{11}a_{12}a_{13}a_{14}a_{15}\dots </math>

<math> 0.a_{21}a_{22}a_{23}a_{24}a_{25}\dots </math>

<math> 0.a_{31}a_{32}a_{33}a_{34}a_{35}\dots </math>

<math> 0.a_{41}a_{42}a_{43}a_{44}a_{45}\dots </math>

<math> \vdots </math>

Where <math>a_{ij}\in\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9\}</math>

Construct the number,

<math>a=0.a_{1}a_{2}a_{3}a_{4}\dots</math>, where


<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>.

Therefore, <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore, <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.[1]

Diagonalization and the Existence of God

Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to Saint Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore, God exists.[2]

However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.[3]

References

  1. A. N. Kolmogorov, Introductory Real Analysis. ISBN 978-0486612263.
  2. http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130
  3. Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds, Arkady Plotnitsky. In After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.