Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  17:52, July 18, 2016
→‎Equal Pay Act 1963: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: full time → full-time
Line 5: Line 5:  
Two landmark court cases, ''Schultz v. Wheaton Glass Co.'' (1970), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and ''Corning Glass Works v. Brennan'' (1974), [[U.S. Supreme Court]] tightened and refined the language of the act.  
 
Two landmark court cases, ''Schultz v. Wheaton Glass Co.'' (1970), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and ''Corning Glass Works v. Brennan'' (1974), [[U.S. Supreme Court]] tightened and refined the language of the act.  
   −
In 1963, average wages for women were about 59% of the wages paid to men. In the UK, the gender pay gap derived from median hourly earnings (excluding overtime) in 2006 was 12.6 per cent using the median and 17.2 per cent using the mean. This means that women who work full time are paid on average 87.4 per cent of men's hourly earnings using the median and 82.8 per cent using the mean.  The full-time gender pay gap decreased by 0.4 percentage points in 2006 using the median but increased by 0.1 percentage points using the mean. This was due to a higher growth in the earnings of men working full-time in the top decile. Because the mean can be distorted by a small number of high earners, who are predominantly men, the Office of National Statistics in the UK now recommends measuring the gender pay gap using the median value.
+
In 1963, average wages for women were about 59% of the wages paid to men. In the UK, the gender pay gap derived from median hourly earnings (excluding overtime) in 2006 was 12.6 per cent using the median and 17.2 per cent using the mean. This means that women who work full-time are paid on average 87.4 per cent of men's hourly earnings using the median and 82.8 per cent using the mean.  The full-time gender pay gap decreased by 0.4 percentage points in 2006 using the median but increased by 0.1 percentage points using the mean. This was due to a higher growth in the earnings of men working full-time in the top decile. Because the mean can be distorted by a small number of high earners, who are predominantly men, the Office of National Statistics in the UK now recommends measuring the gender pay gap using the median value.
    
The part-time gender pay gap declined from 40.4 in April 2005 to 40.21 per cent in April 2006 using the median.  Using the mean, the part-time gender pay gap was the same as it was in 2005.<ref>http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/pay/govt_action.htm</ref> American figures are slightly different.<ref>http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat39.pdf</ref>  
 
The part-time gender pay gap declined from 40.4 in April 2005 to 40.21 per cent in April 2006 using the median.  Using the mean, the part-time gender pay gap was the same as it was in 2005.<ref>http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/pay/govt_action.htm</ref> American figures are slightly different.<ref>http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat39.pdf</ref>  
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719

edits

Navigation menu