| − | '''William Perry's Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development''' (1970) specifies a sequence of stages of development of an individual's [[epitemology|epistemolgical]] and [[ethics|ethical]] position <ref> Perry, William G., Jr. (1970), Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston).</ref>. It is a revisionist/secular structural [[theory]], providing a framework into which different philosophies and sets of values can be fitted. Perry's Theoretical framework has been verified and explanded by later [[researcher]]s <ref> See, for example the expanded scheme developed in Belenky, Mary F.; Clinchy, Blythe M.; Goldberger, Nancy R.; & Tarule, Jill M. (1986), Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind (New York: Basic Books). A version of it can be viewed at: http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/perry.positions.html#perrybook</ref> . A brief summary of Perry's original theory is as follows <ref>Summary is largely taken from Ernest, P., 1991, The Philosophy of Mathematics Education, Falmer Press, pp 112-113</ref>: | + | '''William Perry's Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development''' (1970) specifies a sequence of stages of development of an individual's [[epistemology|epistemological]] and [[ethics|ethical]] position.<ref>Perry, William G., Jr. (1970), Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston).</ref> It is a revisionist/secular structural [[theory]], providing a framework into which different philosophies and sets of values can be fitted. Perry's Theoretical framework has been verified and explained by later [[researcher]]s.<ref>See, for example the expanded scheme developed in Belenky, Mary F.; Clinchy, Blythe M.; Goldberger, Nancy R.; & Tarule, Jill M. (1986), Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind (New York: Basic Books). A version of it can be viewed at: http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/perry.positions.html#perrybook</ref> A brief summary of Perry's original theory is as follows:<ref>Summary is largely taken from Ernest, P., 1991, The Philosophy of Mathematics Education, Falmer Press, pp 112-113</ref> |
| − | | + | Simple [[Dualism]] is a bifurcated structuring of the world between good and bad, right and wrong, us and them. Dualistic views are characterized by simple dichotomies, for example seeing the world as [[Liberal]] v. [[Conservative]]. There is a heavy reliance on [[absolute]]s and [[authority]] as the sources of [[truth]], values and control. Knowledge is rarely justified rationally, but rather by reference to an authority. Dualism implies that actions are either right or wrong. |
| − | Simple [[Dualism]] is a bifurcated structuring of the world between good and bad, right and wrong, us and them. Dualistic views are characterised by simple dichotomies, for example seeing the world as [[Liberal]] v. [[Conservative]]. There is a heavy reliance on [[absolute]]s and [[authority]] as the sources of [[truth]], values and control. Knowledge is rarely justified rationally, but rather by reference to an authority. Dualism implies that actions are either right or wrong. | |
| − | | + | This is a more complex structuring where there is a [[plurality]] of answers, and points of view. This is perceived as an aggregate of discretes without any internal structure or external relation. Viewpoints given are often 'Anyone has a right to his or her opinion', with the implication that no judgement can be made about the quality or validity of the opinion. An example of this is the suggestion that multiple perspectives on the origin of life should be taught in schools, on the grounds that [[intelligent design]], [[young earth creationism]] and [[evolution]] are all theories, and therefore equal in status. |
| − | This is a more complex structuring where there is a [[plurality]] of answers, and points of view. This is perceived as an aggregate of discretes without any internal structure or external relation. Viewpoints given are often 'Anyone has a right to his or her opinion', with the implication that no judgement can be made about the quality or validity of the opinion. An example of this is the suggestion that multiple perspectives on the origin of life should be taught in schools, on the grounds that [[Intelligent Design]], [[Young Earth Creationism]] and [[Evolution]] are all theories, and therefore equal in status. | |