Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Hobbit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Commandment9 (talk | contribs) |
Additioner (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Note that "The Hobbit" is not a prequel to "The Lord of the Rings". The Hobbit was written in 1937, and LOTR was written from 1939 through 1949. In order to be a prequel, The Hobbit would have had to be written after LOTR. [[User:Brewer13210|Brewer13210]] 18:54, 4 April 2007 (EDT) | Note that "The Hobbit" is not a prequel to "The Lord of the Rings". The Hobbit was written in 1937, and LOTR was written from 1939 through 1949. In order to be a prequel, The Hobbit would have had to be written after LOTR. [[User:Brewer13210|Brewer13210]] 18:54, 4 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think that one can't say that Lord of the Rings is a "sequel" to the hobbit. The Lord of the Rings is much thicker in style, writing and information. --[[User:Additioner]] 14:40, 25 April 2007 | ||
== Book Cover == | == Book Cover == | ||
Revision as of 18:40, April 25, 2007
Note that "The Hobbit" is not a prequel to "The Lord of the Rings". The Hobbit was written in 1937, and LOTR was written from 1939 through 1949. In order to be a prequel, The Hobbit would have had to be written after LOTR. Brewer13210 18:54, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
I think that one can't say that Lord of the Rings is a "sequel" to the hobbit. The Lord of the Rings is much thicker in style, writing and information. --User:Additioner 14:40, 25 April 2007
Book Cover
I've tried to add the Cover as an Image, but it looks huge and I don't know how to right align it - any help--Commandment9 19:16, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Just add the code |thumb to the image tag. --Ed Poor 19:17, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks I 'll try to remember that if I add images again. What you have now is what In was aiming for.