Changes

gene exchangers, yet are considered by evolutionists among the most primitive, lowest evolved, life forms known. As a result of this problem, symbiogenesis has been widely criticized—even in the introduction to the major recent work on symbiogenesis.<ref>http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf</ref>}}

gene exchangers, yet are considered by evolutionists among the most primitive, lowest evolved, life forms known. As a result of this problem, symbiogenesis has been widely criticized—even in the introduction to the major recent work on symbiogenesis.<ref>http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf</ref>}}

==Symbiogenesis and Russian evolutionary thought==

==Symbiogenesis and Russian evolutionary thought==

[[Russia]]n evolutionary thought has been more receptive towards symbiogenesis due to the antipathy of many Russians intellectuals to [[Robert Malthus|Malthusian]] thought and the [[Charles Darwin|Darwinian]] notion of [[natural selection]] via competition.<ref>http://www.csun.edu/~vasishth/Vasishth-Darwin+Competition.pdf</ref>  In a April 2009 interview with the writer Suzan Mazur Dr. Lynn Margulus stated:  "In the [[Russia]]n equivalent of the ''[[Encyclopedia Britannica]]'', some 250 pages describe symbiogenesis."<ref>http://www.counterpunch.org/mazur04022009.html</ref>

[[Russia]]n evolutionary thought has been more receptive towards symbiogenesis due to the antipathy of many Russians intellectuals to [[Robert Malthus|Malthusian]] thought and the [[Charles Darwin|Darwinian]] notion of [[natural selection]] via competition.<ref>http://www.csun.edu/~vasishth/Vasishth-Darwin+Competition.pdf</ref>  In an April 2009 interview with the writer Suzan Mazur Dr. Lynn Margulus stated:  "In the [[Russia]]n equivalent of the ''[[Encyclopedia Britannica]]'', some 250 pages describe symbiogenesis."<ref>http://www.counterpunch.org/mazur04022009.html</ref>

==See also ==

==See also ==