Difference between revisions of "EEOC v. County of San Benito"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Category) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This ruling is helpful in establishing the right to confidential [[peer review]] documents. | This ruling is helpful in establishing the right to confidential [[peer review]] documents. | ||
| − | [[Category:Peer | + | [[Category:Peer Review]] |
[[Category:District Court Cases]] | [[Category:District Court Cases]] | ||
[[Category:Discovery]] | [[Category:Discovery]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:34, September 2, 2016
In EEOC v. County of San Benito, 818 F. Supp. 289, (N.D. Cal. 1993), a federal district court ordered a county to comply with a subpoena by the EEOC in holding that "federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's mandates preempt state restrictions" and that California's confidentiality laws relating to peace officers do not provide a basis for declining to comply with the Commission's subpoenas. Id. at 291.
This ruling is helpful in establishing the right to confidential peer review documents.