Difference between revisions of "Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Category) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Category:Circuit Cases]] | [[Category:Circuit Cases]] | ||
[[Category:Third Circuit]] | [[Category:Third Circuit]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Peer | + | [[Category:Peer Review]] |
Revision as of 18:35, September 2, 2016
In Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital, 423 F.3d 184, 201 (3d Cir. 2005), the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a trial court's ruling that the defendant hospital had immunity from damages for suspending and then revoking a physician's medical-dental staff privileges, because this adverse peer review met the definition of professional review under HCQIA.
The decision was rendered by Judge D. Michael Fisher. Then-Judge Samuel Alito joined his decision, as did Judge Thomas L. Ambro.