Difference between revisions of "McLeay v. Bergan Mercy Health Systems Corp."
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Category) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In ''McLeay v. Bergan Mercy Health Systems Corp.'', 714 N.W.2d 7, 18 (2006), the Supreme Court of [[Nebraska]] held that the hospital is immune from liability for damages on all of a physician's claims because the hospital undertook a peer review action governed by [[HCQIA]] and the physician failed to rebut the presumption that the review committee acted reasonably. | In ''McLeay v. Bergan Mercy Health Systems Corp.'', 714 N.W.2d 7, 18 (2006), the Supreme Court of [[Nebraska]] held that the hospital is immune from liability for damages on all of a physician's claims because the hospital undertook a peer review action governed by [[HCQIA]] and the physician failed to rebut the presumption that the review committee acted reasonably. | ||
| − | [[Category:Peer | + | [[Category:Peer Review]] |
Latest revision as of 18:35, September 2, 2016
In McLeay v. Bergan Mercy Health Systems Corp., 714 N.W.2d 7, 18 (2006), the Supreme Court of Nebraska held that the hospital is immune from liability for damages on all of a physician's claims because the hospital undertook a peer review action governed by HCQIA and the physician failed to rebut the presumption that the review committee acted reasonably.