Difference between revisions of "Muslim registry"
(You have not shown that Ars Technica are "advocates of a Muslim registry") |
(The point is to prevent foreign terrorists of any stripe from entering the U.S. - rather than creating (as one reporter originally suggested) a registry specifically targeting Muslims.) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
It has been repeatedly discussed following the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]] that were carried out by [[Islamic terrorist]]s. People who oppose such a registry claim that it violates the [[First Amendment]] right to freedom of religion. | It has been repeatedly discussed following the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]] that were carried out by [[Islamic terrorist]]s. People who oppose such a registry claim that it violates the [[First Amendment]] right to freedom of religion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reporters have tried to get Trump or his supporters to go on record as clearly for or against such a registry. Usually the response is to widen the scope of the discussion to ways to prevent foreign terrorists of any stripe from entering the U.S. - rather than creating (as one reporter originally suggested) a registry specifically targeting Muslims. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 17:34, December 25, 2016
A Muslim registry is a government-maintained database of people who believe in Islam that reside or are visiting the United States.
Bush administration
Shortly after 9-11 the Bush administration created the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS). NSEERS required all males 16 years of age or older visiting from 25 countries to register. Although no religious groups were explicitly targeted, 24 countries had Muslim-majorities; the 25th, North Korea, did not. The countries included: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Egypt, Eritrea, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen.[1] The NSEERS program registered and monitored more than 80,000 men and boys, according to a 2012 report by Penn State Law and Rights Working Group (2 or 3 percent of the US Muslim population). The report stated that more than 13,000 of those registrants were placed in deportation proceedings (around 16 percent).[1]
United States citizens who are Muslims were not covered by NSEERS. Neither were the people who carried out domestic terrorism in the United States since September 11, 2001, including the Boston Marathon bombings, the San Bernadino attack, or the Orlando Florida attack.
Obama administration
In 2011, the Obama administration suspended NSEERS by taking all 25 countries off its list. On December 22, 2016, it finally ended it.[1][2][3]
Non-governmental data sources
It has been claimed that the data is already compiled by Facebook with respect to Muslim Facebook users.
According to Ars Technica:
- Facebook has the data already; the company can provide a list of self-attested Muslims in the US simply by writing a query or two. [1]
Donald Trump comments
Politifact reported: Does Donald Trump want a registry for all Muslims? Or just some Muslims? Or no database at all?
The Republican presidential candidate’s comments on the topic have drawn a lot of criticism, with some pundits and commentators comparing it with the registration of Jews in in Nazi Germany. But Trump has said he didn’t propose such an idea -- a reporter did,[4] and Trump just didn’t understand the question.
His comments and the media coverage of them have left us confused, so we did a deep dive into what exactly Trump said about registering Muslim people in a database.
After going through all of his comments from this past weekend, it seems that Trump definitely wants a database of Syrian refugees, and he hasn’t ruled out the possibility of a database for all Muslims -- though he isn’t actively calling for the latter. [2]
Discussion and controversy
It has been repeatedly discussed following the September 11, 2001 attacks that were carried out by Islamic terrorists. People who oppose such a registry claim that it violates the First Amendment right to freedom of religion.
Reporters have tried to get Trump or his supporters to go on record as clearly for or against such a registry. Usually the response is to widen the scope of the discussion to ways to prevent foreign terrorists of any stripe from entering the U.S. - rather than creating (as one reporter originally suggested) a registry specifically targeting Muslims.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 "The Bush-era Muslim registry failed. Yet the US could be trying it again", cnn, December 22, 2016. Retrieved on December 25, 2016.
- ↑ "Obama Just Made It Harder for Trump to Create a Muslim Registry", The Atlantic. Retrieved on December 25, 2016.
- ↑ "Obama’s team cancels Muslim registry to foil Trump’s ‘extreme vetting’ plans", Washington Times, December 22, 2016. Retrieved on December 25, 2016.
- ↑ I didn't suggest a database-a reporter did.Twitter 10:51 AM - 20 Nov 2015