Difference between revisions of "Lemon v. Kurtzman"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lemon vs. Kurtzman
403 U.S. 602
Decided: 1971
(Categorify) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Lemon vs. Kurtzman was a landmark Supreme Court case iterating a strong test for separation of church & state under the First Amendment. | Lemon vs. Kurtzman was a landmark Supreme Court case iterating a strong test for separation of church & state under the First Amendment. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Under the "Lemon Test," to pass constitutional muster as a law that does not violate the [[Establishment Clause]], a law must: | ||
| + | # Have a legitimate secular purpose, and, | ||
| + | # Not have the primary effect of either inhibiting or advancing religion, and, | ||
| + | # Not promote excessive entanglement between church & state. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The "Lemon Test" was the one applied to invalidate the Dover School Board's intelligent design policy in ''Kitzmiller v. Dover Independent School Discrict.'' | ||
Revision as of 06:06, April 27, 2007
Lemon vs. Kurtzman was a landmark Supreme Court case iterating a strong test for separation of church & state under the First Amendment.
Under the "Lemon Test," to pass constitutional muster as a law that does not violate the Establishment Clause, a law must:
- Have a legitimate secular purpose, and,
- Not have the primary effect of either inhibiting or advancing religion, and,
- Not promote excessive entanglement between church & state.
The "Lemon Test" was the one applied to invalidate the Dover School Board's intelligent design policy in Kitzmiller v. Dover Independent School Discrict.