Difference between revisions of "Sham peer review"
(+ {{fact}}) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid malpractice cases. Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review {{fact}}. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the state of Florida, even though reporting was required by law.{{fact}} | Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid malpractice cases. Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review {{fact}}. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the state of Florida, even though reporting was required by law.{{fact}} | ||
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:science]] |
Revision as of 09:10, April 27, 2007
Sham peer review is a growing problem in hospitals that misuse peer review to discipline and even exclude physicians from their medical staffs[Citation Needed]. Sham peer review includes anticompetitive manipulation of peer review to eliminate popular physicians from the market, or to retaliate against physicians who are outspoken in favor of improved patient care[Citation Needed].
Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid malpractice cases. Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review[Citation Needed]. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the state of Florida, even though reporting was required by law.[Citation Needed]