Difference between revisions of "Debate:Should marijuana be legalized?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Yes, it's less addictive than nicotine, less harmful than alcohol, and thousands of people go to prison for possession. If it were legalized, scum bag drug dealers would be out of jobs, t...)
 
(options)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Yes==
 
Yes, it's less addictive than nicotine, less harmful than alcohol, and thousands of people go to prison for possession.  If it were legalized, scum bag drug dealers would be out of jobs, the price would plummet, drug lords would be nothing, the cops would be freer to pursue the hard drugs, and the prisons would be emptier.  Smoking marijuna certainly isn't something I'd advocate, but I'd rather be an occassional weed smoker than a habitual tobbacco smoker. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 11:29, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Yes, it's less addictive than nicotine, less harmful than alcohol, and thousands of people go to prison for possession.  If it were legalized, scum bag drug dealers would be out of jobs, the price would plummet, drug lords would be nothing, the cops would be freer to pursue the hard drugs, and the prisons would be emptier.  Smoking marijuna certainly isn't something I'd advocate, but I'd rather be an occassional weed smoker than a habitual tobbacco smoker. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 11:29, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
 +
==No==
 +
 +
 +
 +
==Comments==

Revision as of 15:32, April 27, 2007

Yes

Yes, it's less addictive than nicotine, less harmful than alcohol, and thousands of people go to prison for possession. If it were legalized, scum bag drug dealers would be out of jobs, the price would plummet, drug lords would be nothing, the cops would be freer to pursue the hard drugs, and the prisons would be emptier. Smoking marijuna certainly isn't something I'd advocate, but I'd rather be an occassional weed smoker than a habitual tobbacco smoker. Czolgolz 11:29, 27 April 2007 (EDT)


No

Comments