Changes

'''Evolution and science''' have some things in common, but otherwise are in conflict on several pointswith each other. Darwinists say that the [[theory of evolutionEvolution]] is scientific clearly [[atheism|atheistic]]<ref>http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm</ref> and a [[pseudoscience]], easily disproven by numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that no other theory is worthy of considerationexist. This Evolution is not real science because it makes guesses as to what happened in itself the past, which cannot be observed and is anti-scientificnot repeatable, because while real, observational science has always progressed by exposing every existing theory can be observed through repeatable tests. While [[creation science]] is similar to criticism this, the evidence, including in science, in history, and testing in [[Bible|divine revelation]], points to something other than [[evolution]] and welcoming any new theory which can explain known phenomenalong ages.

Here is Creationists also disagree with evolution as it requires a table time frame of billion/millions of years. This is incompatible with their time frame for creation of approximately 6000 years, as derived from the [[LiberalBible]] claims about [[evolution]], contrasted with what science actually knows.

{|border=1 cellpadding=3| Evolution| Science|-| Adherents demonize their critics instead People who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular [[junk science]] are increasingly embracing the [[logic]] of taking objections seriously| Scientific theories must withstand scrutiny|}[[creation science]].