Difference between revisions of "Talk:Taiwan"
Blackjuice (talk | contribs) |
Blackjuice (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
To state that the Japanese occupation of Taiwan was beneficial is erroneous. For the indigenous, non-Han, Taiwanese people, the Japanese were an enemy (and to some tribes, a food source), and the Japanese were responsible for massacring aboriginal people and banning many aspects of their traditional ways of life. It could be argued that the Japanese occupation was beneficial to the Han in terms of transport, modernisation, etc, however. | To state that the Japanese occupation of Taiwan was beneficial is erroneous. For the indigenous, non-Han, Taiwanese people, the Japanese were an enemy (and to some tribes, a food source), and the Japanese were responsible for massacring aboriginal people and banning many aspects of their traditional ways of life. It could be argued that the Japanese occupation was beneficial to the Han in terms of transport, modernisation, etc, however. | ||
| − | + | On that note, Taiwanese aboriginal people are not mentioned at all in the article. Why? They were the only people there for the vast majority of history. | |
Revision as of 19:11, April 27, 2007
Status of Taiwan as a nation and in relation to PRC
While Taiwan's status as a nation remains disputed, it surely satisfies the criteria sufficiently to be included in this category. I suspect most people here on Conservapedia regard it as a more legitimate state than the PRC.
I've placed it in [[Category:Asian Countries]] not because I hold strong opinions about its status, but purely because it seems sensible to include it here.
But I'd welcome an expanded discussion of Taiwan's status vis-a-vis the PRC within the page. --Jeremiah4-22 16:13, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- Since "Taiwan's status as a nation remains disputed", I would assume it does not qualify for this category. If anything, the other article on the Republic of China should fall under this category, and not Taiwan. Scriabin 16:21, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
To state that the Japanese occupation of Taiwan was beneficial is erroneous. For the indigenous, non-Han, Taiwanese people, the Japanese were an enemy (and to some tribes, a food source), and the Japanese were responsible for massacring aboriginal people and banning many aspects of their traditional ways of life. It could be argued that the Japanese occupation was beneficial to the Han in terms of transport, modernisation, etc, however. On that note, Taiwanese aboriginal people are not mentioned at all in the article. Why? They were the only people there for the vast majority of history.