447
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
::::That does seem to be a problem with the editorial policy (though I would say he used violence rather than terror to end the previous Cuban government), but I don’t make the policy (I’ve even argued against it). I’m just telling you what I gather the policy is. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 15:29, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
::::That does seem to be a problem with the editorial policy (though I would say he used violence rather than terror to end the previous Cuban government), but I don’t make the policy (I’ve even argued against it). I’m just telling you what I gather the policy is. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 15:29, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
"the unlawful use of -- or threatened use of -- force or violence against individuals or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives."
By that definition Batista was a terrorist with his coup in 1934, just as Castro is, or George Washington for that matter...
It's all about the word "unlawful", which generally doesn't have the same meaning in different times and countries.
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]