Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,907
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 312:
Line 312: + + +
→re: Donald Trump, Lindsey Graham and the topic bans
:Just thought I'd add my two cents. I think this so-called "travel ban" is useless in part because it doesn't include known terrorist state Saudi Arabia, probably because Trump has so many business dealings there. Nonetheless, such "edit wars" are not going to yield positive results for anyone in the end and will cause unnecessary headaches. I'm an old earth creationist personally, but I know that I would face something similar if I tried edit warring over old versus young earth creationism. The administration of this site understandably has control over the editorial direction of the site, and unlike Wikipedia this site doesn't have pretend neutrality, which is a good thing. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 22:32, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
:Just thought I'd add my two cents. I think this so-called "travel ban" is useless in part because it doesn't include known terrorist state Saudi Arabia, probably because Trump has so many business dealings there. Nonetheless, such "edit wars" are not going to yield positive results for anyone in the end and will cause unnecessary headaches. I'm an old earth creationist personally, but I know that I would face something similar if I tried edit warring over old versus young earth creationism. The administration of this site understandably has control over the editorial direction of the site, and unlike Wikipedia this site doesn't have pretend neutrality, which is a good thing. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 22:32, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
::My first loyality is to Conservapedia and its readers. I believe we can do a better job than Wikipedia in producing a high-quality encyclopedia. I am not "never-Trump" or "always Graham" or "always Rubio". I vote and follow politics, but none of us are here to push any politician's agenda. If you believe I am going too far in one politician's direction, tell me, but don't revert me when I spot someone else going too far in a biased direction. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 23:51, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
::My first loyality is to Conservapedia and its readers. I believe we can do a better job than Wikipedia in producing a high-quality encyclopedia. I am not "never-Trump" or "always Graham" or "always Rubio". I vote and follow politics, but none of us are here to push any politician's agenda. If you believe I am going too far in one politician's direction, tell me, but don't revert me when I spot someone else going too far in a biased direction. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 23:51, 28 June 2017 (EDT)
:::I don't know much about Graham other than he locked horns with Trump during the campaign and that he is probably a hawk when it comes to defense.
:::I do have good reason to believe that the fake news article was locked due to your edit warring. It should have never come to that. That is why I imposed the topical bans. They are a shot across your bow. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:55, 29 June 2017 (EDT)