Difference between revisions of "Talk:Roman Polanski"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '== Swiss arrest rewrite == I've rewritten the awful paragraph found below: In 2009, while visiting Switzerland, he was seized by Swiss authorities, who, unlike the French, ...')
 
(→‎Sex in movie: new section)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
I believe the reasons should be self-evident, but if anyone wants explanation, I'll be glad to discuss. [[User:EMorrissey|EMorrissey]] 16:22, 25 November 2009 (EST)
 
I believe the reasons should be self-evident, but if anyone wants explanation, I'll be glad to discuss. [[User:EMorrissey|EMorrissey]] 16:22, 25 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
== Sex in movie ==
 +
 +
Is it really so bad that there's sex in a movie as long as there aren't shown specific genitals? --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 14:17, 7 July 2017 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:17, July 7, 2017

Swiss arrest rewrite

I've rewritten the awful paragraph found below:

In 2009, while visiting Switzerland, he was seized by Swiss authorities, who, unlike the French, were unwilling to protect a pedophile just to stick it to the United States. He will soon be returned to the US to pay for his despicable actions.

I believe the reasons should be self-evident, but if anyone wants explanation, I'll be glad to discuss. EMorrissey 16:22, 25 November 2009 (EST)

Sex in movie

Is it really so bad that there's sex in a movie as long as there aren't shown specific genitals? --Elessar (talk) 14:17, 7 July 2017 (EDT)