Changes

:::Thirdly, regarding investigating voter fraud, [practically] no one in the Right wing thinks it's a bad thing, but the Left wing will always have someone there to deny it's a problem.  Voters pick up on that, and perhaps realize that the Left wing's opposition isn't really based on trying to apply a practice from the consideration of an abstract concept, but [simply on the belief] that it's always profitable for them to play the odds and assume that the devotion to ethics of conservatives and their imitators will nearly always outweigh their own.

:::Thirdly, regarding investigating voter fraud, [practically] no one in the Right wing thinks it's a bad thing, but the Left wing will always have someone there to deny it's a problem.  Voters pick up on that, and perhaps realize that the Left wing's opposition isn't really based on trying to apply a practice from the consideration of an abstract concept, but [simply on the belief] that it's always profitable for them to play the odds and assume that the devotion to ethics of conservatives and their imitators will nearly always outweigh their own.

:::And so on with the unsealing of court records and biased news reporting.  Due to how outlandish the Left wing's real behavior is, they can bet their right-wing counterparts never would have considered stooping that low, which all-too-often allows the Left's abuses to pass by undetected, unprepared for.

:::And so on with the unsealing of court records and biased news reporting.  Due to how outlandish the Left wing's real behavior is, they can bet their right-wing counterparts never would have considered stooping that low, which all-too-often allows the Left's abuses to pass by undetected, unprepared for.

:::For example, the Obama Administration undertook some unpopular measure that was discussed in the news.  Soon afterwards, the Administration announced its Iran Treaty.  It would have taken some time to read, but—for a while—the common assumption was that Obama was employing a carrot and stick approach.  The great carrot of the Iran treaty would outshine the implementation of the stick to the minor points of contention that preceded it and make the Right Wing look petty.  No one suspected that it would make President Obama look petty as it eventually did.

:::For example, the Obama Administration undertook some unpopular measure that was discussed in the news.  Soon afterwards, the Administration announced its Iran Treaty.  It would have taken some time to read, but—for a while—the common assumption was that Obama was employing a carrot and stick approach.  The great carrot of the Iran treaty would outshine the implementation of the stick to the minor points of contention that preceded it and make the Right Wing look petty.  No one suspected that [the designs employed by President Obama] would make his approach look petty as [they] eventually did.

:::It was revealed that his real strategy with the Iran deal was an attempt to overload the Right Wing with multiple [subtle] issues, together with those from the preceding measure, [and to claim a presence of radical imams in Iran, with no evidence, who shared in the right-wing in opposing the treaty—and thus portray President Obama's State Department as practical centrists—in an attempt to prejudge the treaty] rather than allow the Right Wing to take due consideration [of the actual issues involved].

:::It was revealed that [President Obama's] strategy with the Iran deal was an attempt to overload the Right Wing with multiple [subtle] issues, together with those from the preceding measure, [and to claim a presence of radical imams in Iran, with no evidence, who shared in the Right wing in opposing the treaty.  Thus President Obama and his State Department officers would be portrayed as practical centrists, and, in addition, the President's oppositional attempts would yield the prejudgment of the treaty by interested parties] rather than [by the judgment of] the Right Wing [in taking] due consideration [of the merits of the treaty].

:::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 09:46, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

:::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 09:46, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

:::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 03:19, 15 July 2017 (EDT) Revised.

:::[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 03:19, 15 July 2017 (EDT) Revised.