Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
406 bytes added ,  02:07, July 26, 2017
Line 357: Line 357:  
:::::::As SamHB said, people tend to watch each other--that's how crowd-sourcing (or "[[Best of the Public]]") works.  1990'sguy often checks what I write, and corrects any issues he sees.  I appreciate that, because before he joined, I would sometimes find issues (sometimes fairly serious ones) as I reviewed my work months later (although SamHB did help some). When others review what you have posted, it helps ensure the quality of that material.  When copyediting, it's not nice to be a pest, disrespect the writer's work, etc., but it is beneficial if they make helpful improvements. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 19:12, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
 
:::::::As SamHB said, people tend to watch each other--that's how crowd-sourcing (or "[[Best of the Public]]") works.  1990'sguy often checks what I write, and corrects any issues he sees.  I appreciate that, because before he joined, I would sometimes find issues (sometimes fairly serious ones) as I reviewed my work months later (although SamHB did help some). When others review what you have posted, it helps ensure the quality of that material.  When copyediting, it's not nice to be a pest, disrespect the writer's work, etc., but it is beneficial if they make helpful improvements. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 19:12, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
 
::::::::Yes, and JDano, even though Andy has given me explicit permission to block you, I have chosen not to do so. I am giving you yet another chance to become a more agreeable editor. However, you are continuing the same behaviors -- adding extremely problematic content, ceaseless reverting rather than discussing on the talk page, not even giving a defense of your edits when reverting but using vague statements such as "noteworthy" or etc., and making personal attacks on the editors who oppose your edits rather than going into substance. Your behavior is not helping you ''at all.'' --[[User:1990&#39;sguy|1990&#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:00, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
 
::::::::Yes, and JDano, even though Andy has given me explicit permission to block you, I have chosen not to do so. I am giving you yet another chance to become a more agreeable editor. However, you are continuing the same behaviors -- adding extremely problematic content, ceaseless reverting rather than discussing on the talk page, not even giving a defense of your edits when reverting but using vague statements such as "noteworthy" or etc., and making personal attacks on the editors who oppose your edits rather than going into substance. Your behavior is not helping you ''at all.'' --[[User:1990&#39;sguy|1990&#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:00, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
You really need to go to the talk page '''''before''''' making major edits that completely change an article's tone, like what you just did at [[Public schools in the United States]]. Not only did you completely change the article's tone, but you edit was huge, and I'm not sure what exactly you changed. --[[User:1990&#39;sguy|1990&#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:07, 25 July 2017 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits

Navigation menu