Difference between revisions of "Talk:Obama's "green" jobs initiative"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Guy: Why remove evidence of a successful program. Even Trump likes it.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 22:21, 28 July 2017 (EDT) | Guy: Why remove evidence of a successful program. Even Trump likes it.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 22:21, 28 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
:'''''I didn't remove it.''''' I changed the placement and some of the wording to make it more concise. We don't need a section header for this info, and we don't need wordy in-your-face language showing that a program opposed by conservatives was a financial success (as of Nov. 2014). This is a conservative encyclopedia, and we are not going to parade the financial success of such a program as of nearly three years ago (as if that's all that matters about it). Either get in line or get out. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT) | :'''''I didn't remove it.''''' I changed the placement and some of the wording to make it more concise. We don't need a section header for this info, and we don't need wordy in-your-face language showing that a program opposed by conservatives was a financial success (as of Nov. 2014). This is a conservative encyclopedia, and we are not going to parade the financial success of such a program as of nearly three years ago (as if that's all that matters about it). Either get in line or get out. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::You removed the part about the program success. Why? Wordy? In your face? Get a grip. The program is a continuing success even though conservatives opposed it. Does this mean loaning money to stimulate the economy is no longer a conservative virtue? Is this a case of liberal success and triumph? --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 22:42, 28 July 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:42, July 29, 2017
Guy: Why remove evidence of a successful program. Even Trump likes it.--GinnyS (talk) 22:21, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
- I didn't remove it. I changed the placement and some of the wording to make it more concise. We don't need a section header for this info, and we don't need wordy in-your-face language showing that a program opposed by conservatives was a financial success (as of Nov. 2014). This is a conservative encyclopedia, and we are not going to parade the financial success of such a program as of nearly three years ago (as if that's all that matters about it). Either get in line or get out. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT)
- You removed the part about the program success. Why? Wordy? In your face? Get a grip. The program is a continuing success even though conservatives opposed it. Does this mean loaning money to stimulate the economy is no longer a conservative virtue? Is this a case of liberal success and triumph? --GinnyS (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2017 (EDT)