Talk:Obama's "green" jobs initiative

Guy: Why remove evidence of a successful program. Even Trump likes it.--GinnyS (talk) 22:21, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

I didn't remove it. I changed the placement and some of the wording to make it more concise. We don't need a section header for this info, and we don't need wordy in-your-face language showing that a program opposed by conservatives was a financial success (as of Nov. 2014). This is a conservative encyclopedia, and we are not going to parade the financial success of such a program as of nearly three years ago (as if that's all that matters about it). Either get in line or get out. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:26, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

You removed the part about the program success. Why? Wordy? In your face? Get a grip. The program is a continuing success even though conservatives opposed it. Does this mean loaning money to stimulate the economy is no longer a conservative virtue? Is this a case of liberal success and triumph? --GinnyS (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2017 (EDT)

I did not remove any part of the program's success. Look at the edit. Maybe you didn't look closely at the edit and missed that I combined two paragraphs into one while keeping the content and refs. If you really disagree with this, bring it to Andy and try to convince him. If not, then stop arguing. --1990'sguy (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2017 (EDT)