Difference between revisions of "Sham peer review"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
({{merge|peer review}})
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{merge|peer review}}
 
'''Sham peer review''' is a growing problem in hospitals that misuse peer review to discipline and even exclude physicians from their medical staffs {{fact}}. Sham peer review includes anticompetitive manipulation of peer review to eliminate popular physicians from the market, or to retaliate against physicians who are outspoken in favor of improved patient care {{fact}}.   
 
'''Sham peer review''' is a growing problem in hospitals that misuse peer review to discipline and even exclude physicians from their medical staffs {{fact}}. Sham peer review includes anticompetitive manipulation of peer review to eliminate popular physicians from the market, or to retaliate against physicians who are outspoken in favor of improved patient care {{fact}}.   
  
 
Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid malpractice cases.  Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review {{fact}}. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the  state of Florida, even though reporting was required by law.{{fact}}
 
Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid malpractice cases.  Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review {{fact}}. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the  state of Florida, even though reporting was required by law.{{fact}}
 
[[category:science]]
 
[[category:science]]

Revision as of 16:52, April 30, 2007

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with [[::peer review|peer review]]. (Discuss)

Sham peer review is a growing problem in hospitals that misuse peer review to discipline and even exclude physicians from their medical staffs[Citation Needed]. Sham peer review includes anticompetitive manipulation of peer review to eliminate popular physicians from the market, or to retaliate against physicians who are outspoken in favor of improved patient care[Citation Needed].

Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid malpractice cases. Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review[Citation Needed]. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the state of Florida, even though reporting was required by law.[Citation Needed]