Difference between revisions of "User talk:TrueTory"
(→Problems with your "national liberalism" article: new section) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
It isnt a new thing at all really (idea originated in the 19th century) - it is just that like many other subjects on CP it did not have an article. Thank you for putting back the article however - much appreciated ([[User talk:TrueTory|talk]]) 21:20, 26 September 2017 (GMT) | It isnt a new thing at all really (idea originated in the 19th century) - it is just that like many other subjects on CP it did not have an article. Thank you for putting back the article however - much appreciated ([[User talk:TrueTory|talk]]) 21:20, 26 September 2017 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Problems with your "national liberalism" article == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hello TrueTory, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Your [[National liberalism]], as it stands right now, has several problems. If any of these problems are not fixed, I will request for the article to be deleted again. | ||
| + | *1) The article needs categories | ||
| + | *2) The article '''''needs''''' sources, per #2 of the [[Conservapedia:Commandments]] | ||
| + | *3) The article reads like an essay from your point of view -- I have seen many of your edits, and despite appearing to lean conservative, you are still not fully in line with CP's point of view. The article reads like an attack page on many political parties that are conservative, much more than any other political movement right now in Europe and compares them to the Nazi Party (all unsourced) | ||
| + | *4) Related to point #3, you include several conservative parties without explaining, without citing sources, and without making clear that this is a new term, and only some people actually use this term at all. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please fix these, or else the article will be deleted again. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:45, 26 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:45, September 26, 2017
Welcome!
Hello, TrueTory, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, TrueTory!
Conservative Party
I only partially reverted your edits, but the ones I saw on the Conservative Party are problematic. I already told you that the "anti-Euroskeptic" part in the article refers to the party elite, not the base. I kept the info you added, though, to show the differences between the base and elite. --1990'sguy (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2017 (EDT)
National liberalism
Before I restore the article, what sources do you have that indicates this subject is real? Karajou (talk) 13:16, 26 September 2017 (EDT)
Here are a few: There are also numerous references throughout news articles and so on. What evidence is there that this subject is not real?
- http://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_liberalism.html
- https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=uh0rBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA255&lpg=PA255&dq=%22national+liberalism%22++++Antall&source=bl&ots=a3UYv4zr99&sig=27c9-gfQaON1OHKc4Zb0qjJuQpw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6_-b9rsPWAhWCAsAKHdfjDb8Q6AEILDAB
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_liberalism
- ISBN 0521323940
- ISBN 9781594035654
TrueTory (talk) 13:26, 26 September 2017 (EDT)
- In answer to your question, it's the sudden newness of the subject that had me skeptical. National socialism I get, but "national liberalism"? It's like, did Hitler suddenly strip down to his underwear and start to play the flute in San Fransisco? I'll defer to your word on the subject, with apologies. Karajou (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2017 (EDT)
It isnt a new thing at all really (idea originated in the 19th century) - it is just that like many other subjects on CP it did not have an article. Thank you for putting back the article however - much appreciated (talk) 21:20, 26 September 2017 (GMT)
Problems with your "national liberalism" article
Hello TrueTory,
Your National liberalism, as it stands right now, has several problems. If any of these problems are not fixed, I will request for the article to be deleted again.
- 1) The article needs categories
- 2) The article needs sources, per #2 of the Conservapedia:Commandments
- 3) The article reads like an essay from your point of view -- I have seen many of your edits, and despite appearing to lean conservative, you are still not fully in line with CP's point of view. The article reads like an attack page on many political parties that are conservative, much more than any other political movement right now in Europe and compares them to the Nazi Party (all unsourced)
- 4) Related to point #3, you include several conservative parties without explaining, without citing sources, and without making clear that this is a new term, and only some people actually use this term at all.
Please fix these, or else the article will be deleted again. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:45, 26 September 2017 (EDT)