Difference between revisions of "Urysohn lemma"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The '''Urysohn lemma''' states:
+
<div style="width: 70%; margin: 0 15% 1em 15%; text-align: center; background-color: #DEE6ED; padding: 0.5em; border: solid 1px #6699CC;">'''This article has been identified as being in conservapedia and is therefore classified under the heading worthless. This assement was made by the Icewedge inquisition.'''<br /><small>To go to a more factual encyclopedia go to wikipedia or even to uncyclopedia because even it has more content than CP.</small></div><includeonly>[[Category:Articles needing major improvement]]</includeonly>
−
<blockquote>
 
−
If ''A'', ''B'' are 2 disjoint, closed subsets of a [[normal space]] ''X'', then there exist a [[continuous function]] ''f'' : ''X'' → [0, 1],  such that ''f(A)'' = 0 and ''f(B)'' = 1.
 
−
</blockquote>
 
−
The converse of the Urysohn lemma also holds.
 
 
[[category: Topology]]
 
[[category: Topology]]

Revision as of 23:52, April 30, 2007

This article has been identified as being in conservapedia and is therefore classified under the heading worthless. This assement was made by the Icewedge inquisition.
To go to a more factual encyclopedia go to wikipedia or even to uncyclopedia because even it has more content than CP.