Difference between revisions of "Talk:Patterns of biological evolution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(A big one.)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:That's one of the biggest articles to appear in one hit that I've seen!  Pity it's mostly fiction.  But as it is very popular fiction, I guess it needs to be documented.  And critiqued, of course.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:53, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:That's one of the biggest articles to appear in one hit that I've seen!  Pity it's mostly fiction.  But as it is very popular fiction, I guess it needs to be documented.  And critiqued, of course.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:53, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I invite you to submit your thesis to peer review, Phil. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 11:26, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:26, May 1, 2007

Still working on fleshing this out.--TimS 10:14, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

That's one of the biggest articles to appear in one hit that I've seen! Pity it's mostly fiction. But as it is very popular fiction, I guess it needs to be documented. And critiqued, of course. Philip J. Rayment 10:53, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
I invite you to submit your thesis to peer review, Phil. Nematocyte 11:26, 1 May 2007 (EDT)