Difference between revisions of "Talk:Patterns of biological evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::I welcome the peer review, consider the number of biologists that have already reviewed the information I have presented. I will be adding links to the examples and please look at the existing research publications I cited. PubMed is where most of the research articles are from.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 11:40, 1 May 2007 (EDT) | ::I welcome the peer review, consider the number of biologists that have already reviewed the information I have presented. I will be adding links to the examples and please look at the existing research publications I cited. PubMed is where most of the research articles are from.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 11:40, 1 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::Back to work on [[Gene | + | ::Back to work on [[Gene expression]]--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 11:40, 1 May 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 16:09, May 1, 2007
Still working on fleshing this out.--TimS 10:14, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- That's one of the biggest articles to appear in one hit that I've seen! Pity it's mostly fiction. But as it is very popular fiction, I guess it needs to be documented. And critiqued, of course. Philip J. Rayment 10:53, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- I invite you to submit your thesis to peer review, Phil. Nematocyte 11:26, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- Any article I put on Conservapedia is effectively open to peer review, as is TimS' contribution here, which I hope to peer-review. Philip J. Rayment 11:36, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- I invite you to submit your thesis to peer review, Phil. Nematocyte 11:26, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- I welcome the peer review, consider the number of biologists that have already reviewed the information I have presented. I will be adding links to the examples and please look at the existing research publications I cited. PubMed is where most of the research articles are from.--TimS 11:40, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- Back to work on Gene expression--TimS 11:40, 1 May 2007 (EDT)