Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,330
edits
Changes
mLine 46:
Line 46: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Reverted edits by RoyLostGetOverIt (talk) to last revision by DavidB4
:From the sign-up screen: " Offensive user names will result in that user name being blocked and perhaps the IP address being blocked. Frivolous user names, names of prominent living persons, and user names consisting of, for example, all capital letters or all the same character, may also result in that user name being blocked. User names based on your real name or initials are preferred. Also, do not create multiple accounts."--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 08:59, 15 November 2011 (EST)
:From the sign-up screen: " Offensive user names will result in that user name being blocked and perhaps the IP address being blocked. Frivolous user names, names of prominent living persons, and user names consisting of, for example, all capital letters or all the same character, may also result in that user name being blocked. User names based on your real name or initials are preferred. Also, do not create multiple accounts."--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 08:59, 15 November 2011 (EST)
Yes, I read this and I do not think that my username fell into any of these categories other that the extraordinarily broad, "is whatever you want it to be" category of "Frivolous user names"
Yes, I read this and I do not think that my username fell into any of these categories other that the extraordinarily broad, "is whatever you want it to be" category of "Frivolous user names" {{unsigned|RileyS}}
:It is a frivolous username. Conservapedia requires usernames be based on your real name. Also, sign your comments with four tildes, like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. Thanks.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 09:05, 15 November 2011 (EST)
::Perhaps this should be clarified in the statement, to prevent further misinterpretation of well meaning users. [[User:RileyS|RileyS]] 09:15, 15 November 2011 (EST)
== Marriage Privatization ==
Thanks for adding the conservative counterargument to [[marriage privatization]]. When I wrote it, I meant for it to be fair and balanced, but I couldn't find enough of a conservative argument against it. Keep up the good work. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 15:11, 8 December 2011 (EST)
:You're quite welcome. [[User:DavidE|DavidE]] 18:03, 8 December 2011 (EST)
== N Carolina ==
You are really unpleasant about ssm, aren't you?[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 13:05, 10 May 2012 (EDT)
:What have I said that disagrees with Biblical or conservative principles? [[User:DavidE|DavidE]] 15:28, 10 May 2012 (EDT)
::Is there any reason to believe that Biblical values should dictate the policies of 9 million people?[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 18:52, 10 May 2012 (EDT)
:::This is one nation under God, and God has revealed Himself through the Bible. Your turn: Is there any reason to believe that Biblical values should be irrelevant to the way people vote? [[User:DavidE|DavidE]] 21:25, 11 May 2012 (EDT)