Difference between revisions of "Peer review"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Peer review means scrutiny of a professional's work by others in the same profession.  For example, a "peer-reviewed" medical journal requires other physicians to review and approve an article before it can be published.  A "peer-reviewed" scientific journal requires other scientists to review and approve an article before publication.
+
'''Peer review''' means scrutiny of a professional's work by others in the same profession.  For example, a "peer-reviewed" medical journal requires other physicians to review and approve an article before it can be published.  A "peer-reviewed" scientific journal requires other scientists to review and approve an article before publication.
  
 
A controversial form of peer review is when physicians on the staff of a hospital pass judgment on a fellow physician, and recommend that he be excluded from the medical staff.  This has potential for abuse to eliminate competitors, which is known as [[sham peer review]].
 
A controversial form of peer review is when physicians on the staff of a hospital pass judgment on a fellow physician, and recommend that he be excluded from the medical staff.  This has potential for abuse to eliminate competitors, which is known as [[sham peer review]].
 +
 
[[category:science]]
 
[[category:science]]

Revision as of 12:27, May 2, 2007

Peer review means scrutiny of a professional's work by others in the same profession. For example, a "peer-reviewed" medical journal requires other physicians to review and approve an article before it can be published. A "peer-reviewed" scientific journal requires other scientists to review and approve an article before publication.

A controversial form of peer review is when physicians on the staff of a hospital pass judgment on a fellow physician, and recommend that he be excluded from the medical staff. This has potential for abuse to eliminate competitors, which is known as sham peer review.