Difference between revisions of "Sham peer review"
({{merge|peer review}}) |
DrSandstone (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{merge|peer review}} | {{merge|peer review}} | ||
| − | '''Sham peer review''' is a growing problem in | + | '''Sham peer review''' is a growing problem in [[hospital]]s that misuse [[peer review]] to discipline and even exclude [[physician]]s from their medical staffs {{fact}}. Sham peer review includes anticompetitive manipulation of peer review to eliminate popular physicians from the [[market]], or to [[retaliate]] against physicians who are outspoken in favor of improved patient care {{fact}}. |
| + | |||
| + | Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid [[malpractice]] cases. Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review {{fact}}. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the state of [[Florida]], even though reporting was required by law.{{fact}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
| − | |||
[[category:science]] | [[category:science]] | ||
Revision as of 19:09, May 2, 2007
Sham peer review is a growing problem in hospitals that misuse peer review to discipline and even exclude physicians from their medical staffs[Citation Needed]. Sham peer review includes anticompetitive manipulation of peer review to eliminate popular physicians from the market, or to retaliate against physicians who are outspoken in favor of improved patient care[Citation Needed].
Hospitals have incentives to conceal and cover up errors in order to avoid malpractice cases. Physicians are deterred from reporting errors out of fear of sham peer review[Citation Needed]. The Tampa Tribune (12/28, Gentry) reported that over 80 percent of a one-year's sample of a type of patient safety error was never reported to the state of Florida, even though reporting was required by law.[Citation Needed]